The R&D tax credit has been repealed, effective from the 2009-10 income year. It is still available for qualifying expenditure on R&D activities carried out in the 2008-09 income year. Find out more about the R&D tax credit repeal >
Tax agents: To file a detailed statement on behalf of a client, you must upgrade your online services user ID to access your client's detailed statement. For help, ask the online services support person or administrator in your office, or contact the R&D tax credit team.
Types of eligible expenditure or depreciation loss

Larger version of image | Long description of flowchart
Eligible expenditure
Important
- Unless a section specifically addresses either expenditure or depreciation loss, "eligible expenditure" refers to both.
- To be included in eligible R&D tax credit expenditure for the year, the expenditure must be listed as eligible expenditure and also not listed as excluded expenditure. Find out what expenditure is excluded from a claim.
To be eligible for the R&D tax credit, R&D related expenditure must fall into one of the following categories:
- employee remuneration (salaries and other remuneration of employees doing eligible R&D)
- employee training, recruitment, relocation and travel incurred directly as a result of eligible R&D
- depreciation of tangible assets used in conducting eligible R&D
- the cost of materials incorporated into prototypes
- overheads
- certain overheads relating to administration, human resources, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and security
- rates, utilities, insurance and leasing of buildings, plant and equipment
- items consumed in eligible R&D
- net cost of items processed or transformed in eligible R&D activities, and
- contract payments to an entity or person for eligible R&D services performed on behalf of the claimant.
Details of the rules surrounding deductibility, including deferral of deductions and prepayments, can be found in deductibility of expenditure.
Record keeping
You must retain sufficient documentation to support expenditure claimed for the R&D tax credit.
Where you have apportioned expenditure, records should clearly show how you have done this.
Find out more about keeping records to support your claim.
Employee remuneration
The following remuneration may be eligible for the credit, if it is to an employee conducting SIE or support R&D activities:
- salary or wages
- allowances
- bonuses
- commissions
- extra salary
- overtime
- fringe benefits
- holiday pay
- long-service pay
- ACC employer levy.
Superannuation contributions, fringe benefit tax, specified superannuation contribution withholding tax and insurances paid on behalf of these employees are also eligible.
If an employee works part-time on eligible R&D, the tax credit only applies to the remuneration for the portion of the employee's time that was spent on the eligible R&D.
Remuneration payments to an employee who is also a shareholder are eligible for the tax credit on the same basis that applies to ordinary employees.
Important
If you or anyone else has contributed unpaid time to your R&D, you cannot attribute a value to those hours and include it in your claim. Remuneration must have actually been paid to be eligible expenditure.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 1
Employee's duties
Whether an employee is doing eligible R&D is based on their actual duties, rather than on their job title.
Example - apportionment of employee's time
Company A has four staff and a manager engaged in R&D. They are currently working on two R&D projects. One project occupies two staff full-time and all the current activities qualify as eligible R&D for the tax credit. The other project also occupies two staff but is ineligible for the tax credit.
The R&D manager directs the work of the two teams, undertakes managerial tasks such as on-the-job coaching, performance review and reporting progress to senior management. The manager also gets directly involved in resolving difficult technical issues. She spends approximately 40% of her time performing SIE activities or supporting the eligible R&D activities in these ways.
The remaining 60% of the manager's time is spent supervising the ineligible R&D activities or working on tasks such as production and sales, developing materials for raising finance, preparing for production runs and marketing.
The remuneration paid to the two staff working on the eligible R&D activities is eligible expenditure, as is 40% of the manager's remuneration.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Record keeping
Where your employee undertakes other activities in addition to work on eligible R&D, you must be able to demonstrate you have used an appropriate method to apportion the employee's time.
Appropriate methods might be based on the dates when eligible activities were undertaken, or on records such as timesheets, job cards, or other time recording data.
If you can provide supporting evidence that work patterns were consistent over a period, apportionment might be based on information derived from a sample period.
Find out more about keeping records to support your claim.
Employee training, recruitment, relocation and travel
Training, recruitment, relocation and travel can be eligible expenditure for the R&D tax credit, provided the costs were incurred as a direct result of eligible R&D activities.
If an employee is not dedicated to eligible R&D activities but they are being recruited, relocated or trained for work which includes eligible R&D, apportionment of these costs is appropriate. If the decision to recruit, relocate or train is entirely for activities which are not eligible, no part of the costs may be claimed for the tax credit.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 3
Example - training costs
Mary is working on 3 sets of activities over a year, one of which includes eligible R&D. The eligible activities amount to 40% of her time. During the year she attends:
- Project management training which is applicable across all her activities.
- A two day conference aimed at developing her understanding of the issues she will deal with in her eligible R&D work during the year.
- Training relating to an analytical technique required for an ineligible project - although in future she may use that technique in eligible R&D.
The following are eligible expenditure:
- 40% of the costs of the project management course.
- 100% of the costs for the conference all of which is directly relevant to eligible R&D.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Depreciation loss
Tangible property
Annual depreciation loss on tangible property used in doing eligible R&D is eligible. Find out more about what expenditure is excluded from a claim?
Important
The tax credit is available only to the extent the property is used in doing eligible R&D. The calculation is based on use for eligible R&D as a proportion of total use. Idle time (time available for use) is not included in the calculation.
Depreciation loss attracts the tax credit in two circumstances:
- for "facilitative" assets that are used in the R&D process but that are not the object of the R&D (for example a building the eligible R&D is conducted in, or test equipment used to analyse results, such as a spectrograph)
- for certain "end result" assets that are the object of the R&D, that are used in the R&D process (for example prototypes used for testing) and that are also to be used in the business's other activities.
Find out more about capital expenditure on depreciable assets that are the object of R&D.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 2
- Schedule 21, part B, clauses 5 and 15
Example - facilitative asset
A Co has a computer that is used 20% of the time on eligible R&D, and 30% on other activities. For the remaining 50% of the time it is idle (evenings, weekends, holidays).
The credit may be claimed for the 40% of the annual depreciation deduction for the purpose of the credit.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
End-result tangible assets
The R&D tax credit may be claimed for depreciation on depreciable tangible assets:
- developed as the object of the R&D activities
- which are also to be used in other areas of the business, other than eligible R&D
- while they are being used in the eligible R&D process (for example in an experiment).
For depreciation loss to be claimable the construction itself must be either an SIE activity (a sufficiently innovative construction technique), or a support activity (wholly or mainly for the purpose of, required for, or integral to the SIE activity).
If the expenditure incurred in the development of the end-result was eligible for the credit as it was incurred, then the tax credit does not apply to depreciation of an end-result asset.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 2
Example - end-result tangible asset
A Co is a utility company experimenting with a new material for underground pipes.
It constructs a small area of pipes for testing before rolling them out in the region. In this case, the construction of that part of the network is an eligible support activity.
The test pipes supply gas to a neighbourhood and will remain in place following the test if they are satisfactory. The salaries and materials expended on construction of the pipe network are not eligible for the credit when they are incurred, but depreciation on them is eligible while they are being tested.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Exception - end-result tangible assets written off
There is a general rule that an R&D tax credit cannot be claimed on a depreciation loss that arises if an asset is either sold for less than its tax book value, or if it is written off.
A limited exception may apply if the asset is a failure and is written off. In this case, the tax credit can be claimed for the balance of the costs, provided the conditions in schedule 21, part A, clause 2 and schedule 21, part B, clause 2 are met.
In particular, the asset must be wholly or mainly used in eligible R&D activities and not be used after the R&D activities' end. Development expenditure must not have been eligible for the tax credit.
Find out more about disposal of assets.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 2
- Schedule 21, part B, clause 2
Example - writing off end-result tangible assets
A Co is an energy distribution company developing an innovative household meter. It installs meters in 100 households before installing them more widely, and plans a monitoring and testing programme over two months.
Construction and installation of the test meters is mainly for SIE activities.
If they are satisfactory they will be left in place and used in A Co's normal business operations. The materials and labour in constructing the meters are not eligible for the tax credit as they are incurred. However, depreciation on the meters attracts the tax credit during the testing period.
One month after the trial begins, A Co finds the meters are unsuitable. It removes and scraps them. The balance of the construction and installation cost of the meters are eligible for the credit at that stage.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and or consult your professional advisor.
No claw-back or loss on sale
To minimise compliance costs, there is no claw-back of credits on disposal of assets for more than their tax book value. When the asset is sold to an associate, the price above the vendor's adjusted tax value does not attract the tax credit in the hands of the associated purchaser.
Generally, any loss on sale or write-off of depreciable property also does not attract the tax credit. There is an exception in relation to certain end-result assets that are failures and written off. Find out more about the exclusion in relation to loss on sale or write-off of depreciable assets.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part B, clause 2
- Schedule 21, part B, clause 6
Example - no clawback
Company A buys an asset for $1 million which is used wholly in R&D. Tax credits are claimed in relation to the depreciation. The tax book value at the time of sale is $700,000.
The asset is sold for $650,000. No tax credit is available for the $50,000 loss. Similarly, no claw-back would apply if the asset sold for $800,000.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Pooled property
The R&D tax credit does not apply to depreciable assets in a tax depreciation pool unless the pool consists solely of assets used wholly in conducting the eligible R&D.
End-result intangible assets
Expenditure on seeking to create a depreciable intangible asset as the object of the R&D activities attracts the tax credit when it is incurred. This expenditure would include the cost of labour, materials and depreciation on facilitative assets used in developing the asset.
Note
Expenditure or depreciation on purchasing, leasing, or obtaining a right to use intangible property is not eligible.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 2(a)
- Schedule 21, part B, clauses 8 and 15
Materials incorporated into prototypes and plant
The cost of materials incorporated into a trial model or preliminary version of a product or plant is eligible for the tax credit.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 4
Overheads
Overhead expenditure in relation to eligible R&D activity, that takes the form of employee remuneration, consumables and payments to contractors for services, is eligible for the R&D tax credit, but only where the overheads relate to:
- administration of internal business activities
- human resources functions
- repairs and maintenance
- cleaning
- security.
Rates, utilities (including telecommunications), insurance, and the cost of leasing buildings, plant and equipment are also eligible as overheads.
Exclusion
Allowable overheads do not include depreciation deductions, which may only be claimed under the provisions relating to depreciation.
Note
A regulation-making power exists to exclude overheads that are too remotely connected with the R&D.
Incurred directly
Overheads must be incurred directly for eligible R&D activities.
For example, while expenditure on cleaning consumables used to clean the R&D facility while the facility is being used for eligible R&D would be eligible expenditure, the expenditure on consumables used while cleaning the HR work area will not be eligible. This is despite the fact that HR spends some of their time supporting the R&D staff.
Remuneration as overhead
Remuneration of employees performing the eligible R&D (SIE activities or support activities) is eligible for the R&D tax credit under the provision applying to remuneration.
Human resources and administration personnel, cleaners, maintenance staff and security officers generally do not perform activities that are either SIE or support activities. Their work is not generally integral to the SIE activities as required in the definition of support activities. Because of this, if their remuneration is eligible, it will be eligible as overheads.
Apportionment
Apportionment is required when overheads are only incurred in part as a result of eligible R&D activities.
Where expenditure or depreciation loss relates to both eligible and ineligible activities, you may only claim for the eligible activities, and you will need to apportion the expenditure.
Record keeping
Claimants must be able to show they have used an appropriate method to apportion costs. Find out more about keeping records to support your claim.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 5
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 6
Example - apportionment of time
C Co has an R&D division where employees are engaged in eligible R&D. Their work is comprised of 33% eligible R&D.
C Co employs a cleaner who spends 100% of his time cleaning the R&D division. This is considered to be directly involved in R&D activities and 33% of his remuneration is eligible.
The human resources manager spends a considerable amount of her time attending to issues relating to the R&D division. Twenty percent of her time is related to employees engaged on eligible R&D activities, so 20% of her remuneration is eligible for the tax credit.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Example - apportionment of expenditure
A business has a research facility dedicated to product development.
One of the three projects undertaken includes eligible activities and two additional researchers are hired on temporary contracts for this work.
The eligible R&D runs all year and occupies 25% of the space in the facility.
Some machinery being used in the eligible R&D breaks down, requiring repairs by maintenance staff. The repair work involves the use of expensive capital equipment for several days.
Twenty-five percent of the utilities, rates and annual expenditure on cleaning and security of the research facility could be claimed as eligible expenditure.
The expenditure on consumables used in the repairs, and expenditure associated with hiring the two additional staff could also be claimed, including a portion of the HR and maintenance staff time.
None of the HR or maintenance department overhead costs such as cleaning, security and utilities would be eligible expenditure. Similarly, depreciation on the equipment used in repairing the R&D machinery could not be claimed.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Items consumed by R&D
Items consumed in eligible R&D are eligible for the R&D tax credit. This includes laboratory chemicals and stationery.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 7
Net cost of items processed or transformed by the R&D
For items processed or transformed during eligible R&D activities, only the net expenditure is eligible. The net cost of items is the excess of the cost of the items that are the subject of processing or transformation, over the value of the output.
The value of the output is the sale proceeds when the output is sold in an arm's-length transaction, or if it is not sold, the value is the market value of the output.
Materials
The provision applies to the acquisition or manufacture of raw materials or products that are put through an R&D process. This will often be trading stock and may include:
- fish put through an experimental fish-processing plant
- milk processed into powder in an experimental drying process
- timber cut using a novel technique.
It encompasses the processing of materials or products that do not change during the R&D process, or do change in a manner that is not visible.
Prototypes
This provision is not intended to apply to the initial construction of prototypes, which is dealt with under the capital expenditure or depreciation rules.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 8
Example - determining net cost
A mountain bike manufacturer is developing a new coating for bike frames which will be more durable than paint.
It applies several different trial formulations of the coating to batches of frames to see whether the colour is consistent.
| Cost of inputs (value of bare steel frames and coating) | $2,000 |
| Other production costs (labour, electricity etc) | $1,000 |
| Total costs | $3,000 |
| Value of coated frames | $2,500 |
The credit will not be available for the input cost of $2,000. The other production costs of $1,000 remain eligible for the credit.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Determining market value
The market value of the output should reflect the price that buyers in the open market would be willing to pay for it. This can be obtained by engaging a commercially credible independent professional to value the output.
Contract payments for R&D
When part or all of an R&D project is outsourced, a payment for the R&D to the person or entity performing R&D activities is eligible expenditure, providing it relates to the eligible R&D and is not an excluded expenditure.
This provision applies to payments for both SIE activities and supporting activities, and covers the costs of engaging independent contractors, agency workers and temporary staff to work on R&D.
When the R&D is outsourced to an associate, some of the payment may be ineligible. Find out more about R&D outsourced to an associate.
When work is contracted out, the contractor is generally not eligible for the credit, as they will fail the "on behalf of" test.
Find out if your business is eligible.
Excluded expenditure
Expenditure by a contractor on excluded expenditure, or on expenditure that is subject to limitations, is generally subject to the same exclusions and limitations as if it was made directly by the owner of the R&D.
For example, expenditure overseas by a contractor, or expenditure on internal software development is subject to the same provisions as it would be if the person who commissioned the R&D was doing it themselves. Find out more about the limits on internal software development expenditure and what expenditure is excluded from a claim.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 9
- Schedule 21, part B, clause 9
Separation of costs
It is your responsibility to ensure that your claimed expenditure includes only expenditure on eligible activities, and excludes any ineligible expenditure. You may want to consider arrangements with your contractors to identify total eligible expenditure for each eligible project.
Except where they are an associate, a contractor's profit margin is eligible expenditure, and does not need to be disclosed.
R&D outsourced to an associate
If you outsource your eligible R&D to an associated person, you can only claim the tax credit for the lesser of:
- the amount you actually paid to the associate, or
- the eligible expenditure the associate incurred in third party transactions.
This requirement means you cannot claim the tax credit for any of the associate's profit margin, and the associate will need to record categories of expenditure on eligible R&D in the same way as they would if they were doing the R&D on their own behalf.
New Zealand legislation
Income Tax Act 2007
- Schedule 21, part A, clause 9
- Schedule 21, part B, clause 3
Example - outsourcing R&D
M and B are a partnership that manufactures food products. They want to add a new flavouring to their range of products. They cannot achieve the shelf-life they require using their existing knowledge and techniques.
They contract a laboratory, which is a listed research provider (LRP), to research the problem and advise them.
The laboratory carries out an initial investigation of the chemistry and a literature search, and advises that a solution does not exist and can't be worked out without undertaking SIE activities.
M and B contract the laboratory to carry out the R&D and solve their problem. Under the contract, M and B, not the research provider, will own the results of the research. The initial investigation costs $4,000 and the subsequent experimental process a further $12,000.
Both the payments for initial investigation and the subsequent research are eligible expenditure for M and B. The initial investigation qualifies as supporting activity and the research itself is eligible SIE activity. The research laboratory is not entitled to claim tax credits for the work, as it does not meet the "on behalf of" tests.
If the initial research had found that chemically similar products existed overseas and the solution to the problem was available on normal commercial terms, the initial investigation would not be eligible expenditure as there is no scientific or technological uncertainty or appreciable novelty for the initial investigation work to support.
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor.
Find out more
- Deductibility of expenditure
- Using listed research providers
- Industry research co-operatives (IRCs) and their expenditure
- What expenditure is excluded from a claim?
Date published: 02 Nov 2009
Back to top
