R&D tax credit change log - repeal changes December 2008
Changes to the website content following the December 2008 repeal are outlined in the table below. Where the wording of a change is brief, it is displayed in the left-hand column, in a shaded box. Other changes, such as new examples, can be viewed via the hyperlink or at the page reference shown in the right-hand column. Minor editorial changes, that don't alter the meaning of the content, are not reflected in the change log. To check a specific area of the R&D website for changes, please use these links:
- R&D homepage
- Did you know?
- Find out about the R&D tax credit
- How the R&D tax credit works
- Assess your eligibility
- Deductibility of expenditure
- Types of eligible expenditure or depreciation loss
- What expenditure is excluded from a claim
- Minimum expenditure threshold
- Determinations and binding rulings
- Get ready to file your detailed statement
- Receiving your tax credit
- Correcting errors on your detailed statement
- Disputing our assessment of your claim
- How your claim can be reassessed
- Glossary of R&D tax terms
R&D homepage
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Header A header has been introduced to all pages. "The R&D tax credit has been repealed with effect from 2009-2010 income year.
The R&D tax credit remains available for qualifying expenditure on R&D activities carried out in the 2008-2009 income year. The timeframes for filing and for notices of proposed adjustment to claims, relating to the 2008-2009 income year remain unchanged. Further detail is included in relevant parts of guidance material". |
To provide clarity and alert customers to significant legislative change. | Site area: R&D homepage and all pages within this section. |
Did you know?
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Did you know? The sentences "Claims can only be submitted electronically. You will also need to file an income tax return if you want to claim the credit" replaced with: "You will need to file an income tax return if you want to claim the tax credit. You must also file a detailed statement, which can only be submitted electronically."
|
Updated for correctness - not related to repeal legislation | Page 3 of RTF Site area: Did you know? |
Find out about the R&D tax credit
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
|
Find out about the R&D tax credit Deletion to reflect change in regime. "The R&D tax credit applies
|
Repeal from 2009-10 income year. |
Page 4 of RTF document Site area: Find out about the R&D tax credit |
How the R&D tax credit works
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
|
How the R&D tax credit works Edit to reflect change in regime. "The R&D tax credit applies
|
Repeal from 2009-10 income year. |
Page 7 of RTF document Site area: How the R&D tax credit works |
| Purpose Update to reflect repeal. "A 15% (15 cents in each dollar) tax credit was introduced for research and development (R&D) activities carried out by New Zealand businesses, for the 2008-2009 income year. The government has repealed this credit from the 2009-2010 income year". |
Edit following the repeal of the legislation |
Page 7 of RTF document Site area: How the R&D tax credit works |
Assess your eligibility
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
|
Work out if you could get the R&D tax credit The last paragraph which identifies where to find the R&D tax credit legislation has been expanded to include the repeal legislation. The area now reads as follows: "The R&D tax credit provisions are largely in subpart LH of the Income Tax Act 2007 and in schedule 21 of that Act. A number of administrative provisions are included in the Tax Administration Act 1994. The legislation repealing the tax credits is in part 2 of the Taxation (Urgent Measures and Annual Rates) Act 2008." |
Repeal from 2009-10 income year. |
Page 10 of RTF document Site area: Assess your eligibility |
Deductibility of expenditure
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Add-back Examples Examples now read: Example - no add-back In March 2009, A Co incurs $100,000 of eligible R&D expenditure on services to be provided by a research organisation. The services have not been performed by the end of A Co's income year. The services are provided in May 2009. The $100,000 is deductible in the 2009-10 income year. No tax credits are available for this expenditure. Example - eligibility of add-back B Co is owned by B, who is a shareholder-employee of the company. B is engaged as an employee to do eligible R&D. In March 2009, B Co accrues a liability for B's salary, but has not paid this by the last date for filing its return of income (as provided in section EA 4(3). Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of examples following repeal of legislation |
Page 69 of RTF document Site area: Deductibility of expenditure |
||||||||
|
Items processed or transformed Changes to content to read as follows, example amended and shifted as it no longer illustrates the exception. The amended text and examples are shown below. 'If items of trading stock manufactured or acquired during the year are to be processed or transformed in an eligible R&D process, and have not been processed or transformed by the end of the year, for the purposes of the R&D tax credit, the value of the items is added back under CH 1. As a result, expenditure on the items is not eligible for the tax credit. Example - stock remaining on hand Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of text and examples following the repeal of the legislation |
Page 70 of RFT document Site area: Deductibility of expenditure |
||||||||
| Exceptions to the general rule The fourth exception listed is deleted:
|
Exception no longer applies |
Page 70 of RFT document Site area: Deductibility of expenditure |
||||||||
| Example - Depreciation loss for tax exempt income Phrase "treated as being allowed" is inserted into the first sentence of the third paragraph. Income years changed in example which now read as follows: Example - calculating depreciation loss for tax-exempt income PHB, a charitable society, undertakes eligible R&D in 2008/09. A digital serial analyser, bought new in 2007, is mainly used in the R&D activity. The resulting depreciation loss would be deductible if PHB earned taxable income. PHB's income year runs from 1 April to 31 March, and an independent valuation of the analyser on 1 April 2008 puts its market value at $35,000. When calculating the depreciation loss that is eligible for the credit in 2008/09, PHB assumes the analyser was bought on 1 April 2008 for $35,000. The applicable depreciation rate for the analyser is 26.4% (diminishing value rate for an oscilloscope with 20% loading). PHB is treated as being allowed a deduction for depreciation loss in the 2008/09 income year, which is the completed income year following deemed acquisition. The assumed amounts of depreciation loss and adjusted tax values (ATV) in each year are:
In the 2008/09 income year, PHB can claim a tax credit for $9,240 of eligible depreciation loss. If the digital serial analyser was bought second-hand in 2006, the applicable depreciation rate for the analyser would be 22% (diminishing value rate for an oscilloscope without 20% loading). |
|
Page 71 of RFT document Site area: Deductibility of expenditure |
||||||||
| Assumed salary add-back Amend example to read as follows: Example - assumed salary add-back B Co is owned by B, who is a shareholder-employee. B is engaged as an employee in doing eligible R&D. In March 2009, B Co accrues a liability for B's salary but has not paid it out by the last date for filing its return of income as provided in EA 4(3). B Co elects to defer a deduction for the expenditure under section EJ 23. The salary is paid out in the 2009-10 year. The expenditure is not eligible for a tax credit. Note: Examples are simplified: You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of example following repeal of the legislation |
Page 72 of RFT document Site area: Deductibility of expenditure |
Types of eligible expenditure or depreciation loss
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
|
No claw-back on loss or sale Example amended as shown. Example - no claw-back Company A buys an asset for $1 million which is used wholly in R&D Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of example following the repeal of the legislation. |
Page 79 of RTF document Site area: Types of eligible expenditure or depreciation loss |
What expenditure is excluded from a claim?
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
|
Loss on sale or write-off of depreciable assets Example amended as shown below. Example - loss on disposal of depreciable assets Company AB buys an asset for $1 million which is used wholly in eligible R&D Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of example following the repeal of the legislation |
Page 87 of RTF document Site area: What expenditure is excluded from a claim? |
|
Eligible overseas R&D References to ability to carry forward overseas expenditure over the life of the project removed. Deletions made to content and example. Example on carrying over overseas R&D expenditure completely deleted. Section now reads: "If R&D activities within an R&D project as defined above are carried out in the 2008/09 income year in both New Zealand and overseas, you can claim eligible overseas expenditure of up to 10% of the eligible New Zealand expenditure. Any excess over this is not eligible for the tax credit. New Zealand legislation
Example - overseas expenditure over 10% of New Zealand eligible expenditure A New Zealand company, AB, incurs eligible expenditure of $1 million on an R&D project conducted in New Zealand in the 2008/09 income year. It also incurs $400,000 of eligible expenditure in relation to R&D conducted overseas on the project in the same income year. AB can only claim the R&D tax credit for the overseas expenditure equal to 10% of the New Zealand eligible amount, in this case, that equals $100,000.The other $300,000 is excluded. Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of text and examples following repeal of the legislation | Page 91 of RTF document Site area: What expenditure is excluded from a claim? |
| New Zealand-based R&D under 50% Income year added into example. Example - New Zealand expenditure under 50% G Co is undertaking eligible R&D activities. The eligible expenditure and depreciation loss totals $350,000 in the 2008/09 income year. $100,000 is incurred in New Zealand and $250,000 in Australia. This does not meet the definition of an R&D project. G Co can claim the R&D tax credit for the eligible New Zealand expenditure and depreciation loss, but not for any portion of the overseas expenditure or depreciation loss. |
Edit of text and examples following repeal of the legislation | Page 92 of RTF document Site area: What expenditure is excluded from a claim? |
Minimum eligible expenditure threshold
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum eligible expenditure Year changed in pro rata expenditure example which now reads: Example - pro rata expenditure C is a sole trader establishing a business. C starts up business in October 2008 and has $12,000 of eligible expenditure for R&D she carried out herself, before the end of her income year at 31 March 2009. This expenditure meets the threshold because she can pro rata it over the six-month period she was in business. Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of example following repeal legislation |
Page 100 of RTF Site area: Mininum expenditure threshold |
Determinations and Binding rulings
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Applying for a determination Text deleted on how to apply for a determination, and replaced with text shown below which clarifies that determinations and binding rulings will not be available. Determinations and binding rulings
Determinations and private binding rulings cannot be obtained in relation to the R&D tax credit. New Zealand legislation Tax Administration Act 1994
|
Edit of text following repeal legislation. |
Page 120 of RTF document
|
Get ready to file your detailed statement
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Transitional rules Text and heading edited to reflect the one-income year period of the regime. Section now reads: Filing and Notice of proposed adjustment - periods
Claimants have more time than usual to finalise their R&D claim, in some circumstances. A taxpayer has two years from the date their income tax return was furnished to issue a notice of proposed adjustment (NOPA), if the NOPA relates solely to an amount of R&D credit. Normal response periods apply in all other cases. If (and only if) you did not include an R&D tax credit amount in your income tax return, you also have two years from the date your income tax return was due to be filed to submit an R&D tax credit detailed statement. |
Edit of text to reflect the repeal of the legislation. | Page 132 of RTF document Site area: Get ready to file your detailed statement |
Receiving your tax credit
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction of provisional tax payments Content has been amended to read as follows: "The R&D tax credit is subtracted in calculating the residual income tax figure of a claimant.
Claimants may choose to factor their tax credit into their provisional tax calculations for the year the credit is being claimed. For example, if you have estimated you are entitled to a $60,000 tax credit in 2008/09, you may reduce your provisional tax payments in that year in anticipation of receiving the credit. If provisional tax is estimated, the reduction will be immediate. If you use the uplift or standard method for calculating provisional tax, the reduction will be delayed. Claimants will be liable for use-of-money interest if provisional tax is underpaid because the R&D tax credit claim is reduced or not allowed. Also, claimants who receive R&D tax credits in the 2008/09 should consider the provisional tax implications of the regime's repeal, particularly if they are applying the standard 5% uplift to calculate their liability. To correct for this variation you may need to estimate your provisional tax for the following year." |
Edit of text following the repeal of the legislation. | Page 138 of RTF document Site area: Receiving your tax credit |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Imputation credits Year changed in example which now reads as follows: Example - receiving imputation credits In the 2008-09 year, company A has assessable income of $200,000 and allowable deductions of $170,000, $100,000 of which is eligible expenditure for the tax credit. Company A claims an R&D tax credit of $15,000 on R&D expenditure.
Addendum
Note: Examples are simplified. You should check the details in the detailed R&D information and/or consult your professional advisor. |
Edit of example following repeal the legislation. |
Page 138 of RFT document Site area: Receiving your tax credit |
Correcting errors on your detailed statement
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Managing changes, corrections or disagreements This section previously stated that more content would be added late in 2008. Managing changes, corrections and disagreements. Within the time frames set out in the Notice of proposed adjustment – period the process for disputing an assessment is the standard process. If you simply wish to correct an error in relation to your detailed statement contact us by phone on the normal call centre number stating that your issue relates to the Research and Development Tax Credit (there will be an R&D 0800 number on our website from February 2009) or by writing to us at: |
Update | Page 140 of RTF document. Site area: Correcting errors on your detailed statement |
Disputing our assessment of your claim
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Disputing claims Consequential change to references. What happens if you dispute an assessment? Within the time limits set out in |
Consequential change following changes to other headings |
Page 142 of RTF document Site area: Disputing our assessment of your claim |
How your claim can be reassessed
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| How your claim can be reassessed This section previously stated that more content would be added late in 2008. The content is already covered in "Managing changes corrections and disagreements" – the heading has been deleted. |
Update |
Site area: How your claim can be reassessed |
Glossary of R&D tax terms
| Nature of the Change | Reason for the change | Location of the text |
|---|---|---|
| Glossary - Internal software development limit The phrase "the income year" has been changed to "the 2008-09 year". |
Edit of text to reflect the repeal of the legislation. | Page 155 of RTF document Site area: Glossary of R&D tax terms |
|
Glossary - minimum expenditure threshold The phrase "the income year" has been changed to "the 2008-09 year".
|
Edit of text to reflect the repeal of the legislation. | P160 of RTF document Site area: Glossary of R&D tax terms |
| Glossary - Scientific or technological uncertainty (legal definition) The phrase "You must consider both sources of knowledge" has been deleted. |
Edit of text to reflect the repeal of the legislation. |
Site area: Glossary of R&D tax terms |
Date published: 12 Jan 2009
Back to top
