Gordon has a 70% income interest in CFC A and a 55% income interest in CFC B.
CFC A is an investment company that buys, holds, and sells intellectual property, bonds and shares. It also has a sideline in rubber importing. CFC A does not develop any intellectual property itself. CFC A has intra-group transactions comprising $15,000 of sales of rubber to CFC B and $86,000 of interest income from a loan to CFC B.
CFC B is a shoe manufacturer.
Gordon initially wishes to consolidate the two CFCs for the purpose of the active business test using accounting measures of attributable income and total income.
The accounts of the CFCs are shown below.
| $000s | CFC A | CFC B | Consolidated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To/from CFC B |
To/from 3rd parties |
Total | To/from CFC A |
To/from 3rd parties |
Total | ||
| Income | |||||||
| Sales | 15 | 13 | 28 | 20254 | 20254 | 20267 | |
| less costs of goods sold | 17 | 17 | 15 | 14811 | 14826 | 14828 | |
| Gross profit | 11 | 5428 | 5439 | ||||
| Other income | |||||||
| Interest | 86 | 351 | 437 | 0 | 351 | ||
| Dividend | 901 | 901 | 0 | 901 | |||
| Royalties | 574 | 574 | 0 | 574 | |||
| Operating expenses | |||||||
| Interest | 0 | 86 | 2913 | 2999 | 2913 | ||
| Loss on financial assets | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 | |||
| Rent | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | |||
| Other expenses | 0 | 5020 | 5020 | 5020 | |||
| Net profit before tax | 1885 | -2591 | -706 | ||||
| Attributable income (before removal of minority interests) | 0 | 892 | |||||
| Total income (before removal of minority interests) | 20254 | 21159 | |||||
| Ratio | 4.2% | ||||||
| 30% minority interest removed | 45% minority interest removed | ||||||
| $000s | CFC A | CFC B | Consolidated | ||||
| To/from CFC B |
To/from 3rd parties |
Total | To/from CFC A |
To/from 3rd parties |
Total | ||
| Income | |||||||
| Sales | 11 | 9 | 20 | 11140 | 11140 | 11149 | |
| less costs of goods sold | 12 | 12 | 8 | 8146 | 8154 | 8158 | |
| Gross profit | 8 | 2985 | 2991 | ||||
| Other income | |||||||
| Interest | 60 | 246 | 306 | 0 | 246 | ||
| Dividend | 631 | 631 | 0 | 631 | |||
| Royalties | 402 | 402 | 0 | 402 | |||
| Operating expenses | |||||||
| Interest | 0 | 47 | 1602 | 1649 | 1602 | ||
| Loss on financial assets | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 | |||
| Rent | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |||
| Other expenses | 0 | 2761 | 2761 | 2761 | |||
| Net profit before tax | 1320 | -1425 | -121 | ||||
| Attributable income (after removal of minority interests | 624 | ||||||
| Total income (after removal of minority interests) | 11773 | ||||||
| Ratio | 5.3% | ||||||
Attributable income comprises:
Total income comprises:
[Note that dividends are removed under EX 21E(9)(a) and EX 21E(12)(b).]
If the two CFCs were consolidated without consideration of minority interests (as in the top half of table) there would be attributable income of $892,000 and total income of $21,159,000, giving a ratio - using the formula in subsection EX 21E(5) - of 4.2%.
However, minority interests must be removed line-by-line because, conceptually, Gordon has rights and obligations in respect of only 70% of all the income and expense items of CFC A, and 55% of all the expense income and expense items of CFC B.
So, for example, Gordon counts only $437,000 × 70% = $305,900 of interest income from CFC A and eliminates $86,000 × 70% = $60,200 (being his share of the amount received from CFC B), giving consolidated interest income of $246,700 (as in the interest income line in the bottom half of the table).
After removing minority interests in the consolidation there is attributable income of $624,400 and total income of $11,773,200, giving a ratio of 5.3%. If a test group is used, the CFCs in the test group are not non-attributing active CFCs.
Gordon opts not to use a test group. CFC B, on its own, satisfies the test for being a non-attributing active CFC, since it has no attributable income. CFC A does not.
© Copyright 2013 Inland Revenue