Tax Information Bulletin: Corrections
Correction - SPS 07/05 - Transfer of depreciable property between associated persons - section EE 33 of the Income Tax Act 2004
In the item published under the section "Standard Practice Statements" in the Tax Information Bulletin, Vol19, No9 (October 2007), pp 16-25, please note that the word "nephew" in the first paragraph under "Example2: transfer between individual taxpayers" is incorrect and should be replaced with the word "grandson". The correct example is reproduced below:
Example 2: transfer between individual taxpayers
Jack, a 70-year-old sole trader operating a dairy decides to sell the business assets to his grandson, Johnny. Johnny will take over Jack's dairy business. Jack and Johnny enter into a sale and purchase agreement, whereby all the business assets in the dairy will be sold to Johnny at a price based on an independent valuation. The payment consists of an Acknowledgment of Debt for 75% of the transferred price and cash for the remaining 25%.
Jack retires after the transfer. Johnny carries on the dairy business. Jack helps out in the dairy occasionally but is not otherwise involved in the business. Jack forgives some of the debt annually. Johnny requests that the Commissioner exercises the discretion under section EE 33(4)(a)(ii).
Jack and Johnny are associated persons in accordance with the definition of "relative" in section OB 1.
The Commissioner will exercise the discretion under section EE 33(4)(a)(ii) to allow Johnny to claim tax depreciation on the basis of the assets' transferred price. This is because:
- The transaction is genuine: the transfer of the assets is the result of genuine negotiation between Jack and Johnny. Consideration has passed by Johnny to Jack for the transfer of business assets.
- The transferred price is at a fair market value: the transferred price does not exceed the fair market value of the business assets.
- The transfer of business assets is permanent: the parties to the transaction do not intend to lease or transfer the business assets of the dairy back to Jack.
- The transferor does not continue to benefit from the transferred property: Jack does not have any control over the transferred assets in the dairy. Johnny runs the dairy business by himself. Jack only helps out occasionally.
- The transfer is not tax driven: the main reasons for the transaction are to enable Jack to retire due to his old age and for succession planning.
However, Jack is required to calculate depreciation claw back or gain on disposal at the time of the transfer.
Other pages in: Corrections
- Correction - incorrect figure in the National Average Market Values of Specified Livestock Determination, 2008
- Interim judgment printed in error
- Incorrect currency rates
- NZIT investments not exempt
- Correction
- Correction - Operational Statement OS 06/01 GST Treatment of Supplies of Telecommunications Services
- Correction - SPS 06/02 Writing off outstanding tax
- Correction - to TIB Vol 19, No 3 (April 2007)
- Correction - FBT tax value of vehicle under different balance date scenarios
- Correction - Threshold to account for GST on a payments basis (May 2006)
Date published: 26 Nov 2007
Back to top
